|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kagan Structures produce numerous positive student outcomes.
- Kagan Structures are engaging. Students report greater joy in learning, more interest, and increased liking for school and class. The Kagan cooperative learning structures engage students by stimulating interaction.
- Kagan Structures are aligned with the principles of brain-compatible learning. They provide a safe team context and interpersonal support, so students feel secure. Because of the stimulating interaction and intelligence shifts, the Kagan Structures create high stimulation and novelty, which are conditions for brain-compatible learning.
- Kagan Structures engage a variety of learning styles and intelligences so each learner has opportunities to learn in his/her preferred style.
- Every structure has an embedded curriculum. Some of the most valued outcomes in education are obtained through the use of Kagan Structures, including cooperative skills, character development, multiple intelligences, emotional intelligence, diversity skills, teamwork skills, and higher-level-thinking.
- The structures provide real-life learning experiences, which reduce the transference gap generated by traditional instruction.
- By increasing students’ range of experience, Kagan Structures better prepare students for the workplace of the future. The Kagan Structures emphasize the acquisition of teamwork and communication skills through daily practice of teamwork and functional communication.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For this question you may refer to formal and informal assessment.
- Analyze standardized tests to evaluate the program. It may be based on overall school gains, closing the achievement gap, or on the gains made by your students in the lowest 25%.
- The Kagan Structures allow an easy format for ongoing authentic assessment. In a traditional classroom, when a teacher checks for understanding after presenting, typically the teacher will ask a question of the class. Often only the brightest or most motivated students raise their hands. The teacher ends up hearing from a very unrepresentative sample of the class giving the illusion there is far greater understanding than is actually the case. In contrast, when teachers use Kagan Structures they get a very authentic, ongoing assessment of the class because, as the students are engaged in structures, the teacher walks around listening. A representative sample of the class is sampled, not just those who want to show off that they know. This allows teachers to fine tune their input, to better adjust to the actual levels of their learners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|